Skip to content
Home » Posts » Navigating the Tides of Information: A Case for Healthy Scepticism on the Internet and Social Media

Navigating the Tides of Information: A Case for Healthy Scepticism on the Internet and Social Media

In the age of information, the internet and social media have become central to our daily lives, acting as conduits for news, opinions, and discussions. A recent conversation I had with my son brought to light the importance of navigating these digital waters with a discerning eye.

The dialogue began with a message from Josh, my son, who shared a link to an interview between Tucker Carlson and Vladimir Putin, suggesting it might pique my interest. This interview, conducted by a Western journalist with Russia’s president, is significant as it represents a rare instance of direct communication from a figure frequently discussed but seldom heard in his own words in Western media.

As we delved into the content, it became clear that while the historical references made by Putin needed fact-checking, the bigger picture was the strategy behind such interviews. They serve as a platform for narratives that might align with or counter the mainstream discourse. Here, the importance of fact-checking becomes evident — not to dismiss the content outright but to understand the context and potential biases better.

Continuing the conversation, I agreed with Josh on the potential truths within the interview but emphasised the strategic nature of media. It’s not just about the factual content but also about the underlying intentions and the influence it may have on public perception. It’s a dance of narratives, each step choreographed to lead the audience in a certain direction.

The exchange then shifted to the broader landscape of social media. It’s a powerful marketing tool, especially amongst the youth, who may not engage with traditional media. The risk here is that not everything is fact-checked, and repetition can engrain falsehoods in public consciousness. As I shared with Josh, my approach is to remain open-minded yet healthily sceptical. It’s essential to consider the agenda of the media outlet, the content creator, and the interviewees themselves.

In an era where social media blurs the lines between information and influence, we discussed the critical need for a balanced approach. This means being aware of the persuasive tactics employed and recognising our own susceptibilities to them.

In crafting this article, my intent is not to ignite conflict but to foster understanding. By sharing my perspectives with Josh, I hope to encourage not just him but also others to question, to research, and to think critically about the media they consume. We must all be vigilant in our consumption of information, understanding that while it can enlighten, it can also mislead.

As consumers of information, we have the power to challenge narratives, to seek the truth, and to engage in informed discussions. It’s not about rejecting information but about engaging with it thoughtfully and critically. This approach doesn’t just apply to political interviews; it’s a principle that should guide our interaction with all forms of media.

Let us, therefore, arm ourselves with healthy scepticism and a commitment to uncovering the truth, for in the flood of information, it is our best life raft.